Witryna3 Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225 : AIR 1973 SC 1461. 4 Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 Supp (3) SCC 217 : AIR 1993 SC 477. 5 S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994) 3 SCC 1 : AIR 1994 SC 1918. 6 Nick Robinson et al., Interpreting the Constitution: Supreme Court Constitution Benches Since … WitrynaNamit Sharma v. Union of India, 2012. Facts of the case. Sections 12(5), 12(6), 15(5), and 15(6) of India’s Right to Information (RTI) Act 2005 address the requirements of …
Namit Sharma Vs. Union of India [September 13, 2012]
Witryna45. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India 1978 1 SCC 248 and Charan Lal Sahu v. Union Of India., the Court has taken the view that when the constitutionality of a law is … Witryna2012 titled Union of India Vs. Namit Sharma. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and we are not inclined to stay the operation of the entire judgment in Namit … sign in the lott
31.01
WitrynaNamit Sharma vs Union of India UOI 13092012 SCs120635COM294177 - Read online for free. case judgment. case judgment. ... (1978) 1 SCC 248 and Charanlal Sahu v. Union of India (supra), the Court has taken the view that when the constitutionality of a law is challenged on the ground that it infringes a fundamental right, ... Witryna12 lis 2024 · Namit Sharma v. Union of India, (2013) 1 SCC 745, Para 79. S. 8(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Reserve Bank of India v JayantilalMistry 2015 SCC … Witryna1 mar 2015 · Namit Sharma v Union of India (Information Commissioner case) Sep.11. Supreme Court judgment in the Media Guidelines case. August 31 Mohd. Hussain @ … the queen\\u0027s gambit true story or fiction