Derivative reduction by adiabatic gate

Author: fjhx

August undefined, 2024

WebSep 17, 2015 · We characterize single qubit gates in a superconducting qubit, and by refining our use of Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) pulse shaping along with detuning of the pulses, we obtain gate errors consistently below $10^{-3}$ and leakage rates at the $10^{-5}$ level. With the control optimized, we find that a significant portion … WebMar 12, 2024 · A pulse-efficient circuit transpilation framework for noisy quantum hardware is shown by scaling cross-resonance pulses and exposing each pulse as a gate to remove redundant single-qubit operations with the transpiler, and no additional calibration is needed. 35 PDF View 1 excerpt, cites background

(PDF) Reduced phase error through optimized control of …

Webthe qubit manifold, we implement “half derivative,” an experimental simpliﬁcation of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate (DRAG) control theory. The phase errors are lowered by about a factor of ﬁve using this method to ∼1.6 per gate, and can be tuned … WebFeb 5, 2024 · A related method based on derivative removal by adiabatic gate has been used to eliminate leakage of the drives in weakly anharmonic systems. We further employ our saSTIRAP protocol based on two-photon counterdiabatic driving to demonstrate a … church in seattle washington

arXiv:1007.1690v1 [quant-ph] 10 Jul 2010

WebIn mathematics, the reduced derivative is a generalization of the notion of derivative that is well-suited to the study of functions of bounded variation.Although functions of bounded variation have derivatives in the sense of Radon measures, it is desirable to have a … WebIn order to correct for both phase and amplitude errors specific to virtual transitions and leakage outside of the qubit manifold, we implement “half derivative,” an experimental simplification of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate (DRAG) control theory. WebJan 27, 2024 · One can also use the derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) approach 50,51 in a single qubit gate, but this procedure is not suitable for general three-level systems. dew340 whisper white

Optimal control of stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in a

WebThird, the CZ gate uses adiabatic control that is nonstandard, as it partially moves into the avoided level crossing regime and then back out again, with the amplitude and time of the wave form adjusted to give a π phase shift to the 11 state. Typical solutions to an adiabatic problem consider moving through an avoided level crossing [18–20], WebWe characterize single qubit gates in a superconducting qubit, and by refining our use of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate pulse shaping along with detuning of the pulses, we obtain gate errors consistently below 1 0 -3 and leakage rates at the 1 0 -5 level. church in sedonaWebOct 15, 2010 · In order to correct for both phase and amplitude errors specific to virtual transitions and leakage outside of the qubit manifold, we implement 'half derivative', an experimental simplification of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate (DRAG) control … dew73 de wright

"WebHere we show how to best utilize these virtual Z gates to both improve algorithms and correct pulse errors. We perform randomized benchmarking using a Clifford set of Hadamard and Z gates and show that the error per Clifford is reduced versus a set consisting of standard finite-duration X and Y gates. " - Derivative reduction by adiabatic gate

Derivative reduction by adiabatic gate

Optimal control of stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in …

Webderivative" an experimental simpli cation of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate (DRAG) control theory. The phase errors are lowered by about a factor of ve using this method to 1:6 per gate, and can be tuned to zero. Leakage outside the qubit manifold, to … WebIndeed, the suppression of phase errors using Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) pulse shaping [8] has helped push single qubit delity in super- conducting qubits over 99.9%, nominally...

Did you know?

WebSep 17, 2015 · Indeed, the suppression of phase errors using Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) pulse shaping [8] has helped push single qubit fidelity in super¬ conducting qubits over 99.9%, nominally satisfying one of the requirements for realizing quantum error correction (QEC) [9, 10]. WebMar 21, 2024 · In this work, we used the Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) technique, proposed in Ref. , and largely employed in literature for the reduction of SPAM errors [75,76,78,86,87,88,89]. The DRAG technique corrects the pulse shape Ω ( t ) by introducing a term depending on the derivative of the control pulse d Ω ( t ) / d t [ 74 ],

WebFeb 11, 2024 · This work characterize single qubit gates in a superconducting qubit, and by refining the use of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate pulse shaping along with detuning of the pulses, gate errors consistently below 10-3 and leakage rates at the 10^ {-5} level are obtained. 126 PDF WebJun 20, 2016 · A method for the unsupervised control of quantum gates in near-term quantum computers is defined and it is proved that the non-stable quantum gate becomes controllable via a machine learning method if the quantum gates formulate an entangled gate structure. PDF Unsupervised Quantum Gate Control for Gate-Model Quantum …

WebJan 27, 2024 · One can also use the derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) approach 50, 51 in a single qubit gate, but this procedure is not suitable for general three-level systems. In this article,... WebJul 9, 2010 · This can be corrected using the derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) technique, which modifies the spectral profile of the pulse [143,144].

WebSep 13, 2024 · In this article we review the Derivative Removal by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) framework. DRAG is a multi-transition variant of counterdiabatic driving, where multiple low-lying gapped states in an adiabatic evolution can be avoided simultaneously, greatly reducing operation times compared to the adiabatic limit.

WebJan 18, 2011 · Our result contains and improves the previously developed derivative removal by adiabatic gate technique [F. Motzoi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110501 (2009)] and allows a generalization to other nonlinear oscillators with more than one leakage … church in sedona built in rockWebcharacterize single qubit gates in a superconducting qubit, and by re ning our use of Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) pulse shaping along with detuning of the pulses, we obtain gate errors consistently below 10 3 and leakage rates at the 10 5 level. … church in selma ncWebtheoretical exploration [12] of derivative removal via adiabatic gate (DRAG) to simultaneously suppress leakage and phase errors. We demonstrate the improvement of single-qubit gates on both transmons using the ﬁrst-order correction in DRAG, by switching from rotations induced by Gaussian-enveloped dew5 amazon delivery stationWebSep 13, 2024 · In this article we review the Derivative Removal by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) framework. DRAG is a multi-transition variant of counterdiabatic driving, where multiple low-lying gapped states in an adiabatic evolution can be avoided simultaneously, greatly … church in serembanWebThird, the CZ gate uses adiabatic control that is nonstandard, as it partially moves into the avoided level crossing regime and then back out again, with the amplitude and time of the wave form adjusted to give a π phase shift to the 11 state. Typical solutions to an … church in sedona built in rocksWebSep 1, 2009 · Derivative Reduction by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) [39, 46] is a useful technique to reduce both the leakage and the phase errors which accumulate during the operation of single-qubit gates. The most ... church in sevenoaksWebreview the Derivative Removal by Adiabatic Gate (DRAG) framework. DRAG is multi-transition variant of counterdiabatic driving, where multiple low-lying gapped states in an adiabatic evolution can be avoided simultaneously, greatly reducing operation times … dewa 19 chord pupus